Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, the Member of Parliament for the South Dayi Constituency, has shared a video of First Deputy Speaker of Parliament, in which the latter came across as a politician who for political expediency will run from his stated position and conviction, and cling to his convenience.
The video in the custody of The Herald paints a perfect picture of a “political chameleon” from the man changing his colour when the need arises. It is unclear what Mr. Dafeamekpor’s intentions are with the release of the video but it raises arguments about Joseph Osei-Owusu’s integrity and whether or not he can be relied upon.
In the video, Joseph Osei-Owusu, was captured affirming that he loses his vote whenever he presides over the House.
Dafeamekpor shared the 37-seconds clip which captures Lawyer Osei-Owusu, alias Joe Wise, stating “Honourable Members, when it comes to the question of voting, it is clear that anytime any of the Deputy Speakers, or any other member elected to preside is in the chair, that member does not vote. That has never been in dispute.
“Anytime a member is presiding, either the Deputy Speaker or a member who by necessity is elected from our main members to preside, that member does not vote,” he stresses while in the speaker’s chair at the time.
More Read
In the wake of the March 9, 2022 Supreme Court ruling that affirmed that Deputy Speakers could vote and also constitute quorum for the House, Dafeamekpor has been vocal about the flawed nature of the unanimous ruling by the Justice Jones Doste-led bench.
He captioned his post a follows: “This was the 1st Deputy Speaker speaking to clarify this same matter sometime last year then they got him to change his mind a couple of months ago because they needed more numbers for E-Levy.
“Vindication lies in the womb of time. Just watch this short video and hear him ….,” he wrote. The video per GhanaWeb checks was in the aftermath of the decision by the Majority Group to reverse a purported rejection of the 2022 budget by the Minority.
In a later interview with TV3 Network, Joe Wise reiterated his position of having to be counted but losing voting rights. “When I preside, I lose my vote. I can’t vote but it doesn’t mean I am not a Member present. There is no way our proceedings will be correct if I am
Change of stance, chaos over E-Levy Weeks after his position that he could be counted but cannot vote, Joe Wise made a U-turn when he attempted to vote on the government’s Electronic Transactions Bill (E-Levy).
He stated his new position relative to voting insisting that he was entitled to be counted and to vote even when he is presiding, except that he must leave the Speaker seat and take off his gown before doing so.
His decision triggered chaotic scenes in Parliament leading to the suspension of consideration on the Bill. In an interview with Joy News after the incident in the House he said: “It is clear that you do not retain your original vote whilst on the seat. What I did on that day was that after the 2nd Deputy Speaker had voted, I invited him to take the chair, so I can leave the chair, de-robe and vote.
He continued: “So my insistence is not to vote from the chair, but as and when necessary I will leave the chair if I’m the one presiding or when the 2nd Deputy Speaker is presiding, he can leave the chair and change over so he can also exercise his vote. That, I insist on it.”
Following controversy over the rejection and later approval of the 2022 budget by one-sided Caucuses of the 8th Parliament, a private legal practitioner, Justice Abdulai, filed a case against at the Attorney General at the Supreme Court. He prayed the Court to interpret two Articles – 102 and 104 – of the 1992 Constitution and by so doing to declare the proceedings in Parliament on November 30, 2021, which led to the passage of the 2022 Budget and Economic Policy as unconstitutional.
He specifically cited the fact that the Presiding Speaker, First Deputy Speaker, Joseph Osei-Owusu, had counted his vote despite acting as Speaker.
However, in defence of the State, the Attorney-General, Godfred Yeboah Dame, argued that there was no express provision in the 1992 Constitution that stops a Deputy Speaker presiding over proceedings from voting or counting himself as part of MPs present to form the right quorum.
The Minority have expressly rejected the decision with Leader Haruna Iddrisu referring to it as repugnant to the provisions in Article 102 and 104.
“The Court’s ruling aptly captures the judicial support for the Electronic Transaction Levy (E-levy), for a struggling economy in destress,” he said. “The Judiciary of Ghana is also failing Ghana’s parliamentary democracy in their inability to appreciate the true meaning of Article 110 of the 1992 Constitution that Parliament shall, by Standing Orders, regulate its own proceedings.”
Joseph Osei Owusu, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) MP for Bekwai after last Wednesday’s ruling had insisted that he will continue to interpret the constitution and the standing orders of Parliament as he understands it.
“Matters that have never arisen, are now on the fore due to the numbers we have in parliament. Anytime there is disagreement, as I have said before, I will interpret the rules and the laws as I understand it.”
He stated that those who hold contrary views to his rulings can always seek redress at the appropriate forum.
“I encourage those who disagree with me to boldly state their position or refer it to the appropriate body like the Supreme Court to guide us. As of now, at the end of it all, we are being guided. What has not happened before where the way was not clearly stated by our standing orders has now been cleared by the Supreme Court, and I think it will help us in our democracy and practice going forward.”
Speaking to the press after the Supreme Court judgment which many describe as an affirmation of his decision, Joseph Osei Owusu described the judgment of the apex court as refreshing.
“I’m glad that the decision practically affirms the position I took. There is still some misinterpretation as to whether I participated in the vote itself on the night of the 30th or not. Anyone who saw the video will attest to the fact that it was a voice vote and I didn’t participate in it, however, I insisted that I be counted as a Member of Parliament present to constitute the quorum before a decision was taken. Indeed, this decision affirms that position I took, and I find that refreshing.”
