• About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
The Herald Ghana
Advertisement
  • Home
  • General
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Editorial
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Feature
  • Health
  • World
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • General
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Editorial
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Feature
  • Health
  • World
No Result
View All Result
The Herald Ghana
No Result
View All Result

Opuni Files Another Motion To Get “Bias & Hostile” Honyenuga To Step Aside

December 13, 2021
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0 0

Lawyers of former COCOBOD boss, Dr. Stephen Opuni, have renewed calls to get Supreme Court judge, Justice ClemenceHonyenuga to recuse himself, for allegedly exhibiting bias tendencies and open hostility towards their client.

The judge, who is sitting with additional responsibility as a high court judge, has also been accused of giving preferential treatment to the Attorney General.

“The conduct of His Lordship Justice ClemenceHonyenuga since I opened my defence is one of open hostility towards me, his acts and conduct is such that justice cannot be said to be seen to be done,” the affidavit in support of the motion filed on December 10, 2021 captured.

Justice Clemence Jackson Honyenuga’s handling of the case of former COCOBOD boss, Dr. Stephen Opuni and businessman Seidu Agongo, accused of causing financial loss to the state and contravention of the Public Procurement Act, has been full of controversies.

RelatedPosts

Ash/Reg: Farmer drags chief, cocoa board to court for destroying 25 acres of his cocoa farm. 

Supreme Court won’t change its decision on Opuni – Principal State Attorney predicts

Opuni & Agongo lawyers demand constitutional interpretation on Justice Honyenuga’s continuous stay despite retirement  

Several attempts in the past to get the judge to step down due to a number of alleged “unfavourable and bias” actions by him have been unsuccessful.

In the latest application at the high court, Dr. Stephen Opuni, prayed that “based on the averments contained in the above, it is only fair and just that the trial judge recuses himself from further hearing of the suit.”

The affidavit made reference to at least two occasions where the judge imposed dates on the parties, and would not hear his counsel out even on medical grounds.

He noted that sometimes his lawyers are unable to make it to court on the imposed dates, because they have made prior commitments in other courts.

“That I state further that this conduct of the learned judge in unilaterally imposing dates did not happen when the Prosecution was presenting its case. During that time, the Learned Judge always agreed with the lawyers before adjourning the case. Unfortunately, the Learned Judge has refused to grant me the same conditions and facilities which were afforded to the Prosecution.”

He stated further that the trial judge “has exhibited open hostility towards me since I opened my defence and this is evident where he (the learned judge), in open court, apart from not hearing my Counsel with respect to adjourned dates, bangs his files on his table when giving dates and on his own, orders the court to rise whiles angrily screaming “court rise”. Indeed, at the last hearing on the 9th day of December, 2021, the learned trial judge unilaterally adjourned the suit at a time my lawyer was on his feet and addressing him with respect to the proposed adjourned dates and walked away to his chambers.”

According to Dr. Opuni, he is convinced that the conducts of Justice Honyenuga breached his right to a fair hearing and also constitute a breach of Rule 3 (5) of the code of conduct for judges and magistrates, which stipulates that:

“A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice, A Judge shall not, in the performance of Judicial duties, by words or conduct, manifest bias or prejudice including but not limited to bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status, and shall require Court personnel and others not to do so.”

Justice Clemence Honyenuga, is also being accused of making prejudicial comments.

“That the fact that the judge is biased towards me is evidence by his prejudicial comment which he made in court on the 9th day of December, 2021 where he stated in open court that the evidence of my witnesses cannot exonerate me save my own evidence. This shows a clear case of bias and that the learned judge has already made his mind even though my first witness has not yet completed his evidence in chief. I add that this comment is further evidence that the learned trial judge would not consider the evidence of my witness even though he has not completed his evidence in chief.”

The affidavit added, “That during the examination in chief of my first witness, when my lawyer sought to elicit response from my witness on portions of the findings of fact made by the judge in his ruling dismissing our application for submission of no case including the above, the learned trial judge stopped him and furiously informed him that he was not going to allow my lawyer to ask questions by referring to his ruling. This Conduct is one of bias since the questions to be asked are based on the express finding made by the judge with respect to the submission of no case in which the judge made extensive references to the evidence of various prosecution witnesses affirming the basis of his ruling.

“That I state that unless the learned trial judge recuses himself from hearing this matter, I would be denied a fair trial since I would be prevented from conducting the case in a way which I am entitled to by making references in this instance to specific portions of the ruling.

“That I state further that the fact that the learned trial judge is biased is further evidenced from his conduct of the 2nd day of December, 2021, where the learned trial judge, even though aware of the fact that I had the constitutional right of deciding the mode of calling witnesses, initially objected to DW1 giving evidence. This was most unfortunate in that at no point in time during the presentation of the case by Prosecution did he seek in any way whatsoever and or howsoever to instruct on the sequence of calling their witnesses.

“That I state further that the learned judge has repeated on numerous occasions since I opened my defence that his diary at the Supreme Court does not afford him enough time hence his act of imposing these said dates. It is thus clear to me that I will not get a fair trial as my trial would be rushed through byhis Lordship the trial judge”.

The motion is expected to be moved by counsel for Dr. Opuni on December 16, 2021.

In July this year, the ordinary bench of the Supreme Court in a 3:2 majority decision ordered Justice Honyenuga to take his hands off the case for showing signs of bias.

But in 4:3 ruling, the decision was overturned in a review application that have raised eyebrow among the legal fraternity.

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe
Previous Post

GII Rubbishes Akufo-Addo’s Lopsided Claims On Corruption

Next Post

Adwoa Sarfo Refuses To Step Foot In Gender Ministry …. Sanitation Minister Is Still Acting

RelatedPosts

Ash/Reg: Farmer drags chief, cocoa board to court for destroying 25 acres of his cocoa farm. 

Ash/Reg: Farmer drags chief, cocoa board to court for destroying 25 acres of his cocoa farm. 

2 weeks ago
Retired Justice Honyenuga summons Opuni’s medical doctor to court

Supreme Court won’t change its decision on Opuni – Principal State Attorney predicts

2 months ago
Opuni & Agongo lawyers demand constitutional interpretation on Justice Honyenuga’s continuous stay despite retirement  

Opuni & Agongo lawyers demand constitutional interpretation on Justice Honyenuga’s continuous stay despite retirement  

2 months ago
Ex-Supreme Court Judge  confesses misquoting 1992 constitution to hang on Opuni case after compulsory retirement

Ex-Supreme Court Judge  confesses misquoting 1992 constitution to hang on Opuni case after compulsory retirement

3 months ago
A lot more inflow of forex expected due to syndicated loan deal – Oppong Nkrumah

A lot more inflow of forex expected due to syndicated loan deal – Oppong Nkrumah

3 months ago
Eye surgeon schools retired judge & state prosecutor -On

Eye surgeon schools retired judge & state prosecutor -On

4 months ago
Next Post
Adwoa Sarfo Refuses To Step Foot In Gender Ministry …. Sanitation Minister Is Still Acting

Adwoa Sarfo Refuses To Step Foot In Gender Ministry …. Sanitation Minister Is Still Acting

It Is Time To Re-Open The Land Borders

It Is Time To Re-Open The Land Borders

We’re not obstructing gov’t; ask them to do the right thing – Minority to Otumfuo

We’re not obstructing gov’t; ask them to do the right thing – Minority to Otumfuo

Leave Comment
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Auditor General’s report and matters arising
  • Alan Kyerematen is a rare servant leader. he is without blemish- Rev Dr Robert Ampiah-Kwofi
  • NPP Under Kufuor lost 2008 election in a run-off, how will the party fare Under Akufo-Addo in 2024?
  • BB Menson the “Virus” returns with Night Train
  • Emirates operates milestone demonstration flight powered with 100% Sustainable Aviation Fuel
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

Copyright © 2022 The Herald Ghana. All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • General
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Editorial
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Feature
  • Health
  • World

Copyright © 2022 The Herald Ghana. All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist