By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
The Herald ghanaThe Herald ghana
  • Home
  • General
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Editorial
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Feature
  • Health
  • World
Reading: Body counts: Has Prince Harry illuminated a necessary evil?
Share
Aa
The Herald ghanaThe Herald ghana
Aa
  • Home
  • General
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Editorial
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Feature
  • Health
  • World
Search
  • Home
  • General
  • Entertainment
  • Politics
  • Editorial
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Feature
  • Health
  • World
Follow US
  • Advertise
Copyright © 2022 The Herald Ghana. All Rights Reserved
Feature

Body counts: Has Prince Harry illuminated a necessary evil?

razak.bawa
Published January 18, 2023
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

By Dr Emma J Breeze, Assistant Professor in International Criminal Law, University of Birmingham

“My number is 25. It’s not a number that fills me with satisfaction, but nor does it embarrass me.”

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, has revealed in his new book Spare, that due to advances in military technology, he is able to say with certainty the number of people he killed during the time he served in the army in Afghanistan.

His public claim that his ‘body count’ is 25 has had a negative reaction, to say the least, and has opened a discussion about the role individual soldiers’ body counts should, or should not, play when discussing military action or operations.

The counting of deaths during armed conflict has had a difficult history. During the Vietnam war the US controversially measured their progress by the number of enemy deaths. Several decades later, during the Iraq war in 2003, US General Tommy Franks famously said “we don’t do body counts” reasoning that progress in achieving combat aims was contextual.

More Read

Prince Harry ‘betrayed’ British Army as ‘kill list’ claim riles Taliban

One of Meghan Markle’s former costars has revealed that he was offered insane money to lie about her.

Over recent decades the increased datafication of life generally, and in the armed forces more specifically, has led to a heightened focus on the recording of casualties of conflict, whether civilian or combatant. However, this data is inherently limited due to the considerable ‘fog of war’ and finding accurate data is a herculean task.

Significantly though, measuring the success of combat should not be based on the number of dead enemies. International Humanitarian Law limits conflict to only that which is strictly necessary to achieve the overall military objectives. Therefore, now, as has ever been the case, the destruction of one’s enemy is not the objective militaries should be seeking.

That said, there are legitimate and valid reasons to record casualties of armed conflict. States are legally required to review their military operations to ensure that they meet the principles of International Humanitarian Law, particularly in relation to collateral damage. The law permits the loss of civilian life during armed conflict but limits this so that civilian casualties should not be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. This proportionality assessment must be carried out prior to an attack as well as assessed afterwards. Any excessive loss of civilian life could amount to a war crime and states are obliged to investigate any such incident. Thus, when the information on body counts remains linked to the context, and relates to more than an individual soldier’s recollection, it can be a valuable tool for assessment and accountability.

Another important reason for the existence of body counts is to account for the loss of life, preserve the memory of those who have died, and honour the victims and their families. Independent projects such as the Bosnian Book of the Dead, which lists the 95,940 names of those killed in the Balkans conflict, can facilitate the reconciliation efforts needed in post-conflict regions.

Body counts can be political tools used to further conversations about accountability, and when the contextual data is made available beyond militaries, it can be used by NGOs, researchers, journalists, and local organisations to develop strategies and to challenge governments.

Above all we should never forget that those numbers relate to people, all of whom have families, and all of whom should be respected. 

You Might Also Like

Prince Harry ‘betrayed’ British Army as ‘kill list’ claim riles Taliban

One of Meghan Markle’s former costars has revealed that he was offered insane money to lie about her.

razak.bawa January 18, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Copy Link
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Cry0
Happy0
Surprise0
Angry0
Wink0
Previous Article Central region will be a traditional region for us – NDC Central regional Chairman
Next Article Zenith Bank Ghana ceases operations as a Trustee in securities industry and capital market
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Instagram Follow
Youtube Subscribe
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Latest News

Dr Nyaho-Tamakloe calls on Kufuor, Clergy to speak up
General Major 1 September 21, 2023
Indian Doctors partner Family Health Hospital to educate public on urology, fertility conditions
Health Major 2 September 21, 2023
One dead at Taifa Timber Market as traders, land guards violently clash over eviction
General Major 2 September 20, 2023
Turaco acquires MicroEnsure Ghana to deepen affordable insurance coverage across Africa
Business Major 2 September 20, 2023
CurrencyRate

You Might also Like

GeneralMajor 1

Prince Harry ‘betrayed’ British Army as ‘kill list’ claim riles Taliban

January 6, 2023
Entertainment

One of Meghan Markle’s former costars has revealed that he was offered insane money to lie about her.

March 22, 2022

Copyright © 2022 The Herald Ghana. All Rights Reserved

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?